Nasher blog title-4

How to nego­tia­te con­s­truc­tion pro­jects more suc­cessful­ly after the tur­n­around in inte­rest rates

Expo Real will take place in Munich from Octo­ber 4 to 6. This is the most important trade fair of the year for real estate pro­ject deve­lo­pers. After years of boom, the sec­tor is facing a long list of chal­lenges: hig­her inte­rest rates, increased requi­re­ments in terms of ener­gy effi­ci­en­cy and the ESG, the decli­ne of bricks-and-mortar retail and the decre­asing demand for office space. As a result, the first well-known real estate deve­lo­pers have recent­ly had to open insol­ven­cy pro­cee­dings. The Nas­her Nego­tia­ti­on Insti­tu­te uses its indus­try exper­ti­se and the latest sci­en­ti­fic methods to help mini­mi­ze the cos­ts of con­s­truc­tion pro­jects. 

Mini­miza­ti­on of award cos­ts

The Nas­her Nego­tia­ti­on Insti­tu­te car­ri­es out a struc­tu­red award pro­cess when awar­ding con­tracts for indi­vi­du­al trades. The nego­tia­ti­on solu­ti­ons are always case-spe­ci­fic. Each trade requi­res its own under­stan­ding of tech­no­lo­gy, the mar­ket and pri­ces. In some situa­tions, inte­gra­ti­ve nego­tia­ti­on stra­te­gies are effec­ti­ve; in other situa­tions, com­pe­ti­ti­ve approa­ches are more pro­mi­sing. With this approach, Nas­her achie­ves addi­tio­nal savings of around 10% ‑15%.

Mini­mi­zing the cos­ts of chan­ge manage­ment

During the con­s­truc­tion pha­se, the cos­ts of con­s­truc­tion pro­jects often explo­de due to tech­ni­cal chan­ges. Ren­ego­tia­ti­ons then have to be con­duc­ted in which pro­ject deve­lo­pers are in a weak nego­tia­ting posi­ti­on. By using so-cal­led chan­ge manage­ment cata­logs and query­ing con­tin­gent pri­ces, chan­ge cos­ts can be demons­tra­b­ly redu­ced signi­fi­cant­ly. This redu­ces chan­ge cos­ts by around 15%-20%.

Opti­miza­ti­on of non-con­trac­tu­al pre­mi­ses

Our expe­ri­ence shows that con­trac­tu­al pre­mi­ses are often nego­tia­ted far too late, some­ti­mes only after the ser­vice pro­vi­ders have been sel­ec­ted. This puts pro­ject deve­lo­pers in a poor nego­tia­ting posi­ti­on when the typi­cal con­trac­tu­al dis­pu­tes, such as pay­ment dates or pen­al­ties, come up. Our experts the­r­e­fo­re start nego­tia­ting important con­trac­tu­al pre­mi­ses from the 1st RfQ.

Iden­ti­fi­ca­ti­on and avo­id­ance of pri­ce fixing

Ille­gal anti-com­pe­ti­ti­ve agree­ments are unfort­u­na­te­ly very com­mon in the con­s­truc­tion indus­try. For­t­u­na­te­ly, the­re have been ground­brea­king advan­ces in sci­ence. Machi­ne lear­ning algo­rith­ms can be used to iden­ti­fy col­lu­si­ve pri­cing and other frau­du­lent beha­vi­or. Howe­ver, the gre­at added value of the­se tools is not in detec­ting col­lu­si­ve beha­vi­or, but in pre­ven­ting it. As soon as the use of the­se methods is made trans­pa­rent to sup­pli­ers, the risk of col­lu­si­ve beha­vi­or drops signi­fi­cant­ly.

Are you inte­res­ted in fin­ding out more about how the Nas­her Nego­tia­ti­on Insti­tu­te can opti­mi­ze the cos­ts of pro­ject deve­lo­pers? Then use the form to send a direct mes­sa­ge to our Head of Con­sul­ting Dr. Oliver Mäsch­le.

Learn more

Direct mes­sa­ge to Dr. Mäsch­le

Share this post!